True or False: Efforts to promote stability can sometimes overlook human rights and justice.

The assertion that efforts to promote stability can sometimes overlook human rights and justice is indeed accurate. In various contexts, especially during conflicts or in post-conflict situations, the push for stability can lead to prioritizing political expediency or the restoration of order over the enforcement of human rights or justice measures.

Governments or organizations may focus on ensuring a quick return to stability, which can result in overlooking or sidelining critical human rights issues. For instance, in some scenarios, leaders may make compromises with groups that have poor human rights records in the name of achieving peace or stability, thus potentially disregarding justice for victims.

This dynamic has been observed in numerous global situations where the urgency to restore order overshadows the need to address past injustices or prevent current human rights abuses. The complexities of political landscapes can lead to such trade-offs, illustrating that the drive for stability does not always align with upholding human rights or achieving justice effectively.