What is a potential downside of relying heavily on technology in humanitarian efforts?

Relying heavily on technology in humanitarian efforts can lead to a significant downside, specifically concerning dependence on technological infrastructure. This dependence means that if the technology fails or if there are issues with the infrastructure—such as power outages, lack of internet connectivity, or system malfunctions—humanitarian operations can be severely hampered. This is particularly concerning in crisis situations where timely intervention is critical, and problems with technology can delay responses or lead to inefficiencies.

While technological advancements can enhance communication and operational capabilities, they also create vulnerabilities. Humanitarian efforts often take place in unstable environments where technological reliability can be compromised. If organizations become too reliant on these tools, they might find themselves unprepared to respond effectively without them, potentially endangering the populations they aim to assist.

In contrast, other options suggest benefits of technological reliance, such as improved funding or enhanced communication methods. However, these positives can overshadow the critical risks of over-dependence on technology when the infrastructure is not stable or accessible, particularly in the contexts where humanitarian missions are most needed. Therefore, this potential downside emphasizes the importance of maintaining a balance between technology use and traditional methods of humanitarian assistance.