What is the difference between "direct protection" and "indirect protection" in PoC?

In the context of Protection of Civilians (PoC), the distinction between direct protection and indirect protection is fundamentally about the types of strategies employed to safeguard individuals from harm. Direct protection refers to immediate and tangible actions taken to ensure the physical safety of individuals at risk, such as the presence of security forces to prevent violence or the establishment of safe zones.

On the other hand, indirect protection focuses on addressing the root causes of vulnerability and insecurity. This can involve measures such as promoting social cohesion, enhancing local governance, providing education, and improving living conditions. By tackling these underlying issues, indirect protection helps create a more secure environment over time, thus reducing the need for direct intervention.

Understanding this distinction is crucial for implementing effective PoC strategies. It highlights that while direct measures may be necessary in immediate crises, sustainable long-term security must also consider the broader socio-economic and political factors contributing to violence and insecurity.